← Case detail
FA-26-00412 · FOIA · FORSCOM

Review and redact

Readiness reporting guidance for FY26 rotational deployments

Processing inside Army M365 tenant boundary, zero data egress
Memorandum, FY26 readiness reporting standards for rotational deploymentsNo redaction scan has run on this artifact yet
Working copySelect text to withhold it by hand. Nothing here is covered up: authorized reviewers see the record in full.
Page 1 of 4
No redactions on this page

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND, 4700 Knox Street, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310. Office Symbol AFOP-OP. Subject: FY26 Readiness Reporting Standards for Rotational Deployments to the European Theater.

References. Army Regulation 220-1, Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration. FORSCOM Regulation 220-3, Readiness Reporting Procedures. Headquarters, Department of the Army Execution Order 041-26, Rotational Force Generation.

Purpose. This memorandum establishes readiness reporting standards for units identified for rotational deployment to the European theater during fiscal year 2026, and supersedes the interim guidance issued 14 August 2025.

Applicability. This guidance applies to all FORSCOM major subordinate commands and to reporting units identified in the FY26 rotational force pool. Units not identified in that pool continue to report under existing procedures without change.

Effective date. This guidance is effective upon receipt and remains in effect through 30 September 2026 unless rescinded or superseded.

Released record previewGenerated from the current decisions. The withheld characters are never written into this copy.
Page 1 of 4

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND, 4700 Knox Street, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310. Office Symbol AFOP-OP. Subject: FY26 Readiness Reporting Standards for Rotational Deployments to the European Theater.

References. Army Regulation 220-1, Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration. FORSCOM Regulation 220-3, Readiness Reporting Procedures. Headquarters, Department of the Army Execution Order 041-26, Rotational Force Generation.

Purpose. This memorandum establishes readiness reporting standards for units identified for rotational deployment to the European theater during fiscal year 2026, and supersedes the interim guidance issued 14 August 2025.

Applicability. This guidance applies to all FORSCOM major subordinate commands and to reporting units identified in the FY26 rotational force pool. Units not identified in that pool continue to report under existing procedures without change.

Effective date. This guidance is effective upon receipt and remains in effect through 30 September 2026 unless rescinded or superseded.

Decision recordEvery suggestion the model made, and what a person decided about it. Rejected suggestions stay on the record; they are released in full.
  • Span 1AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 2, paragraph 3, characters 34 to 348
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) · staff recommendation to a deciding official

    Staff recommendation to defer the equipment substitution threshold, offered to the Deputy Chief of Staff and expressly not adopted. Pre-decisional and deliberative.

  • Span 2AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 4, paragraph 1, characters 109 to 184
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6) · personal name and duty telephone number

    Names the action officer and gives a direct commercial telephone line. Release would associate an identifiable individual with a contact point of no public interest.

Electronic mail chain, FY26 readiness reporting implementationNo redaction scan has run on this artifact yet
Working copySelect text to withhold it by hand. Nothing here is covered up: authorized reviewers see the record in full.
Page 1 of 4
1 suggestion pending

From: Reyes, Nathan J MAJ USARMY FORSCOM. Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2025, 0847. To: Corbett, Elaine A CIV USARMY FORSCOM. Subject: RE: FY26 reporting guidance, substitution threshold question.

Elaine, following up on the staff call. The analysis cell position is that the substitution threshold as drafted will produce reporting artifacts in the first quarter, because the baseline was drawn from FY24 rotation data and the equipment sets have turned over since.

My recommendation is that we hold the threshold change and revisit after the first quarter submissions are in.(b)(5) I understand that puts us out of step with the HQDA execution order timeline, and I am not the approval authority for that decision.

Happy to build the read-ahead if G-3/5/7 wants to take it forward.

Released record previewGenerated from the current decisions. The withheld characters are never written into this copy.
Page 1 of 4

From: Reyes, Nathan J MAJ USARMY FORSCOM. Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2025, 0847. To: Corbett, Elaine A CIV USARMY FORSCOM. Subject: RE: FY26 reporting guidance, substitution threshold question.

Elaine, following up on the staff call. The analysis cell position is that the substitution threshold as drafted will produce reporting artifacts in the first quarter, because the baseline was drawn from FY24 rotation data and the equipment sets have turned over since.

My recommendation is that we hold the threshold change and revisit after the first quarter submissions are in. I understand that puts us out of step with the HQDA execution order timeline, and I am not the approval authority for that decision.

Happy to build the read-ahead if G-3/5/7 wants to take it forward.

Decision recordEvery suggestion the model made, and what a person decided about it. Rejected suggestions stay on the record; they are released in full.
  • Span 1AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 1, paragraph 3, characters 0 to 110
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) · recommendation offered before a decision

    An action officer's recommendation to hold the threshold change, sent up the chain before any decision was taken. Deliberative and pre-decisional.

  • Span 2AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 2, paragraph 3, characters 13 to 176
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) · internal assessment of a withholding posture

    Staff assessment of how the recommendation would be treated on release, exchanged while the memorandum was still in draft. Deliberative.

  • Span 3AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 4, paragraph 3, characters 18 to 158
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) · characterization of a deciding official's likely position

    A supervisor's read on what the Deputy Chief of Staff would accept, given before the decision was made. Pre-decisional and deliberative.

Implementing instruction 26-03, readiness reporting data elementsNo redaction scan has run on this artifact yet
Working copySelect text to withhold it by hand. Nothing here is covered up: authorized reviewers see the record in full.
Page 1 of 5
No redactions on this page

IMPLEMENTING INSTRUCTION 26-03. Readiness Reporting Data Elements for FY26 Rotational Deployments. Issued by Headquarters, United States Army Forces Command, Deputy Chief of Staff G-3/5/7.

Scope. This instruction specifies the data elements, formats, and validation rules applicable to monthly readiness submissions under the FY26 rotational reporting standards.

Relationship to other guidance. This instruction implements and does not supersede the FY26 readiness reporting standards memorandum. Where this instruction and that memorandum conflict, the memorandum governs.

Released record previewGenerated from the current decisions. The withheld characters are never written into this copy.
Page 1 of 5

IMPLEMENTING INSTRUCTION 26-03. Readiness Reporting Data Elements for FY26 Rotational Deployments. Issued by Headquarters, United States Army Forces Command, Deputy Chief of Staff G-3/5/7.

Scope. This instruction specifies the data elements, formats, and validation rules applicable to monthly readiness submissions under the FY26 rotational reporting standards.

Relationship to other guidance. This instruction implements and does not supersede the FY26 readiness reporting standards memorandum. Where this instruction and that memorandum conflict, the memorandum governs.

Decision recordEvery suggestion the model made, and what a person decided about it. Rejected suggestions stay on the record; they are released in full.
  • Span 1AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 4, paragraph 1, characters 230 to 359
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) · vendor pricing and repair cycle terms

    Repair cycle times, parts sourcing arrangements, and unit pricing supplied by a sustainment contractor under confidentiality terms. Commercial information whose release would cause competitive harm.

  • Span 2AI suggestedPending decision
    Page 5, paragraph 2, characters 132 to 175
    5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6) · personal name and duty telephone number

    Names the analysis cell action officer with a direct commercial line. Release serves no public understanding of agency operations.